Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: IT: 29 July 09 - David Begg OpEd.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:24 am 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Jun 25, 2006
Posts: 2180
From the Irish Times, 29th July 2009. As the paper notes "David Begg is general secretary of the Irish Congress of Trade Unions and a member of The Irish Times Trust".

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opi ... 74531.html

Blue Horseshoe

_________________
Never underestimate the power of large groups of stupid people.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IT: 29 July 09 - David Begg OpEd.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:27 am 
Offline
Too Big to Fail

Joined: Feb 21, 2008
Posts: 3114
Boy they're really clinging onto that "domestic demand" shtick for dear life. It must be the most important sector of the economy, rivaling the banks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IT: 29 July 09 - David Begg OpEd.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:31 am 
Offline
Real Estate Developer

Joined: Jan 31, 2008
Posts: 802
Blue Horseshoe wrote:
From the Irish Times, 29th July 2009. As the paper notes "David Begg is general secretary of the Irish Congress of Trade Unions and a member of The Irish Times Trust".

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opi ... 74531.html

Blue Horseshoe

There was lots of great little goodies thrown at the beardy union bosses during the boom!
Enough seats on boards to stock an Ikea shop.
Just to keep them sweet like.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IT: 29 July 09 - David Begg OpEd.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:37 am 
Offline
Planning Tribunal Attendee
User avatar

Joined: Apr 23, 2008
Posts: 1406
Location: In exile
I think taking on the deflationist slash and burn consensus is no bad thing.

Debate should be welcomed on what is hardening into an unquestionable orthodoxy of what needs to be done


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IT: 29 July 09 - David Begg OpEd.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:48 am 
Offline
Too Big to Fail

Joined: Feb 21, 2008
Posts: 3114
Rick Flair wrote:
I think taking on the deflationist slash and burn consensus is no bad thing.

Unless you're offering viable alternatives yes it's a bad thing. All he's doing is offering simplistic and inaccurate reasoning to people already predisposed to not wanting spending cuts (i.e. people with a vested interest in spending not being cut).

The US is a completely different economy to Ireland's - they're not relying on outside investment to get out of this mess and they have their own currency. If you want to compare with the US you'd be better to compare Ireland to California which is in the midst of its own crisis. Nobody is seriously suggesting they borrow even more (they can't anyway) to stimulate the economy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IT: 29 July 09 - David Begg OpEd.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:51 am 
Offline
Real Estate Developer

Joined: Feb 1, 2007
Posts: 880
If this is the level of shite that you need to be able to write to get on the board of the Central Bank or the ESRI, it is no wonder the country is fubared.

_________________
LEFT = RIGHT


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IT: 29 July 09 - David Begg OpEd.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:54 am 
Offline
Of Systemic Importance
User avatar

Joined: Nov 7, 2006
Posts: 5174
Location: Cloud 9
Blue Horseshoe wrote:
From the Irish Times, 29th July 2009. As the paper notes "David Begg is general secretary of the Irish Congress of Trade Unions and a member of The Irish Times Trust".

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opi ... 74531.html

Blue Horseshoe


And director of the Central Bank
and Aer Lingus

_________________
Landlord throwing you out on your ear so he can sell?
Need to save a few bob?
Then take a look at the bargain aisle
http://www.thebargainaisle.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IT: 29 July 09 - David Begg OpEd.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:55 am 
Offline
Planning Tribunal Attendee
User avatar

Joined: Apr 23, 2008
Posts: 1406
Location: In exile
sharper wrote:
Rick Flair wrote:
I think taking on the deflationist slash and burn consensus is no bad thing.

Unless you're offering viable alternatives yes it's a bad thing. All he's doing is offering simplistic and inaccurate reasoning to people already predisposed to not wanting spending cuts (i.e. people with a vested interest in spending not being cut).

The US is a completely different economy to Ireland's - they're not relying on outside investment to get out of this mess and they have their own currency. If you want to compare with the US you'd be better to compare Ireland to California which is in the midst of its own crisis. Nobody is seriously suggesting they borrow even more (they can't anyway) to stimulate the economy.


Well there seems to be a fair few people over here http://www.progressive-economy.ie/
that are willing to argue the toss. Personally, I’m not sure where I stand. It truly is rock and a hard place stuff.

I just cant help but instinctively feel that slashing the wages of a load of civil servants and firing a few thousands more will do more harm than good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IT: 29 July 09 - David Begg OpEd.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:57 am 
Offline
Too Big to Fail
User avatar

Joined: Jun 2, 2007
Posts: 3271
Location: Top of the Bubble
It is a great idea in theory. Government spends to counteract the decline in private sector spending.

Unfortunately our reality is very different.
The Irish government is already borrowing 18% of GNP. We just cannot afford to borrow anymore and repay it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IT: 29 July 09 - David Begg OpEd.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:58 am 
Offline
Too Big to Fail

Joined: Feb 21, 2008
Posts: 3114
Rick Flair wrote:
I just cant help but instinctively feel that slashing the wages of a load of civil servants and firing a few thousands more will do more harm than good.

It's that or double the tax take of the economy. How much harm do you think that'll cause?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IT: 29 July 09 - David Begg OpEd.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:59 am 
Offline
Planning Tribunal Attendee
User avatar

Joined: Apr 23, 2008
Posts: 1406
Location: In exile
Dreaded_Estate wrote:
It is a great idea in theory. Government spends to counteract the decline in private sector spending.

Unfortunately our reality is very different.
The Irish government is already borrowing 18% of GNP. We just cannot afford to borrow anymore and repay it.


But we can afford NAMA?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IT: 29 July 09 - David Begg OpEd.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:01 am 
Online
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 2806
sharper wrote:
Rick Flair wrote:
I think taking on the deflationist slash and burn consensus is no bad thing.

Unless you're offering viable alternatives yes it's a bad thing. All he's doing is offering simplistic and inaccurate reasoning to people already predisposed to not wanting spending cuts (i.e. people with a vested interest in spending not being cut).

The US is a completely different economy to Ireland's - they're not relying on outside investment to get out of this mess and they have their own currency. If you want to compare with the US you'd be better to compare Ireland to California which is in the midst of its own crisis. Nobody is seriously suggesting they borrow even more (they can't anyway) to stimulate the economy.


I dont think begg gets it.
We are running a €20bln annual deficit.
We cant afford it.
There is no alternative.

Is anyone else here genuinely concerned that a person like begg holds so many directorships and is in a position of influence ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IT: 29 July 09 - David Begg OpEd.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:04 am 
Offline
Nationalised

Joined: Sep 13, 2007
Posts: 17230
Location: Tullamore
Rick Flair wrote:
But we can afford NAMA?

Sing it from the rooftops.

_________________
"It is impossible to design a system so perfect that no one needs to be good."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IT: 29 July 09 - David Begg OpEd.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:04 am 
Online
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 2806
Rick Flair wrote:
Dreaded_Estate wrote:
It is a great idea in theory. Government spends to counteract the decline in private sector spending.

Unfortunately our reality is very different.
The Irish government is already borrowing 18% of GNP. We just cannot afford to borrow anymore and repay it.


But we can afford NAMA?


Of course not.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IT: 29 July 09 - David Begg OpEd.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:05 am 
Offline
Too Big to Fail

Joined: Feb 21, 2008
Posts: 3114
mr_anderson wrote:
I dont think begg gets it.
We are running a €20bln annual deficit.
We cant afford it.
There is no alternative.

I agree. So I find it highly unpersuasive when someone talks about the problems of reducing demand and the risks of relying on global trade - sure ok they're bad and risky, but what exactly are we supposed to be doing? I have to wonder where he thinks money comes from because he appears to think we can run an economy based purely on government spending, much safer than that risky export thingy.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Neverbeenaworsetimetobuy, Yahoo [Bot] and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to: