Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 390 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 26  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: The Federal Reserve
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:40 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 1678
Location: ENGLAND
Timothy Geitner has just been confirmed the new US treasury secrertary.Let the money printing begin. :evil:

_________________
IT'S DIFFERENT THIS TIME


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Federal Reserve
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:55 am 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation
User avatar

Joined: Apr 28, 2008
Posts: 2067
PROFESSORI wrote:
Timothy Geithner has just been confirmed the new US treasury secrertary.Let the money printing begin. :evil:


It says a lot about this new administration, and America in general, that the guy who created unbelievable chaos by letting Lehman fail and cheated on his taxes, is confirmed because he's supposed to be "smart".

_________________
Irish public sector wages bill contains a roughly speaking 48% premium relative to the PS counterparts in similar economies around the world. - Constantin Gurdgiev May 30, 2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Federal Reserve
PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:47 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 1678
Location: ENGLAND
Timothy Geitner has just appointed Mark Patterson as his chief of staff at the treasury.This is in direct contravention of Obama's pledge to bar lobbyists from federal government,Mark Patterson was a lobbyist for Goldman Sachs and is now in charge of the treasury a government department he once used to lobby on behalf of Goldman Sachs :shock: :shock: :shock:

How refreshing to see the winds of change blowing through the White House.....................

Quote:
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/28/a ... -the-rule/

An exception, or the rule?
posted at 4:30 pm on January 28, 2009 by Ed Morrissey

Do you recall that moment of Hope and ChangeTM when Barack Obama barred lobbyists from the federal government by executive order? By golly, Obama would clean up government and keep lobbyists out of policy-making positions, or else … he wouldn’t. For the second time in the eight days since signing the order, the Obama administration has plucked a lobbyist and put him in charge of the policy on which he’d lobbied:

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner picked a former Goldman Sachs lobbyist as a top aide Tuesday, the same day he announced rules aimed at reducing the role of lobbyists in agency decisions.

Mark Patterson will serve as Geithner’s chief of staff at Treasury, which oversees the government’s $700 billion financial bailout program. Goldman Sachs received $10 billion of that money.

Goldman Sachs, eh? Four months ago, I wrote about GS’s political connections and predicted that they would survive the crisis. Now they have one of their bailout lobbyists in charge of the bailout, a neat trick that even the Bush administration would have avoided.

And what exactly did Obama promise us as Hope and ChangeTM?

>>>

Quote:
http://www.freep.com/article/20090129/NEWS15/90129005

January 29, 2009

Exceptions to Obama ethics rules under scrutiny
By FREDREKA SCHOUTEN
USA TODAY

WASHINGTON — White House press secretary Robert Gibbs on Wednesday called President Barack Obama’s ethics rules the most stringent ever, despite the high-level appointments of former lobbyists to key jobs in recent days.

Gibbs said granting a “limited number of waivers” to the rules to allow lobbyists to join the administration does not undermine “the strongest ethics and transparency policy ... that we’ve seen in the history of our country.”

His comments came one day after Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner named a former Goldman Sachs lobbyist, Mark Patterson, as his chief of staff. Patterson lobbied for the firm until April.

Obama, who pledged in the presidential campaign that lobbyists “won’t find a job in my White House,” issued the ethics rules during his first full day in office. They bar lobbyists from working on matters they lobbied about during the previous two years.
>>>>

_________________
IT'S DIFFERENT THIS TIME


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Federal Reserve
PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:21 pm 
Offline
Holiday Home Owner
User avatar

Joined: Jan 26, 2009
Posts: 346
Location: Outside the Comfort Zone
Professori wrote:
This is in direct contravention of Obama's pledge to bar lobbyists from federal government,Mark Patterson was a lobbyist for Goldman Sachs and is now in charge of the treasury a government department he once used to lobby on behalf of Goldman Sachs
Yep, Obama had to agree to that before getting the nomination, otherwise they would have put their weight behind Hillary.

Nobody can get elected without the nod from Goldman Sachs. If a candidate doesnt agree to work with them, theyll maker sure you dont get elected.

They now are now in control of the US Treasury. Its only a matter of time before they get control of the BOE, as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Federal Reserve
PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:07 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 1678
Location: ENGLAND
This has been posted recently by Green Bear and is specifically about the threat posed by the Federal Reserve to our freedom,our savings and our very way of life,the first half is basically a condensed version of The Money Masters a three hour long documentary on the history of banking and how European bankers took control of America by establishing the Federal Reserve,the rest is an overview of the lax or complete absence of regulation,compounded by the removal of laws which were passed after the last great crash to prevent its re-occurrence, and how dangerous the present situation is.

Of course it is also an opportunity to close down the Fed,but it can only be done by educating the peolple in how central banks have taken over governments and completely control our economies and our lives.

This is the problem:most people don't understand the system,if they did they would demand change,watch it and pass it on to people you know,the internet is the only way people can find out.


Gary Fielder:The Gig is Up.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 4420953428

Bill Still:The Money Masters.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 0256183936

_________________
IT'S DIFFERENT THIS TIME


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Federal Reserve
PostPosted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:20 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 1678
Location: ENGLAND
Quote:
U.S. Stocks Advance as Merck, Schering Lead Rally in Drugmakers
By Elizabeth Stanton
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid= ... refer=home

Feb. 3 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. stocks gained, snapping a three-day drop, as earnings topped estimates at Merck & Co. and Schering-Plough Corp. and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said the government will step up efforts to fight the recession.

Merck climbed 6.4 percent after savings from job cuts boosted profit, while Schering-Plough added 8.2 percent on earnings helped by cost reductions and added sales from an acquisition. A gauge of homebuilders jumped 8.6 percent after D.R. Horton Inc. reported its smallest loss in five quarters and pending home sales increased for the first time since August.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index climbed 1.6 percent to 838.49. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 141.53 points, or 1.8 percent, to 8,078.36. The Russell 2000 Index increased 0.7 percent.

“What we are seeing is not necessarily optimism, but a pull back in the pessimism,” said David Kelly, chief market strategist at JPMorgan Funds, which oversaw $304 billion as of Oct. 8. “We have had an unrelenting deluge of bad news on the economy. When you get a little better news it can cause an exaggerated reaction in the market.”

Benchmark indexes rallied to their highs of the day after Geithner told the Wall Street Journal that White House fiscal policy is “about to get very aggressive” as President Barack Obama’s economics team prepares to address the deepening recession.


>>>>

_________________
IT'S DIFFERENT THIS TIME


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Federal Reserve
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 11:16 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 1678
Location: ENGLAND
To grasp how completely out of touch US politicians are from reality and the cause of the current economic mess,and how ignorant they are of the role the Fed has played in this crisis and the last depression just read the following article,jawdropping is not the word for it..............thoroughly depressing stuff.


Quote:
Volcker Warns Against Overloading Fed
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 03720.html
By Neil Irwin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 5, 2009; Page D02

Congress risks undermining the Federal Reserve's independence if it provides the central bank with new powers to manage the financial system, former Fed chairman Paul A. Volcker said yesterday.

Nevertheless, he recommended that lawmakers move aggressively on a regulatory overhaul.

Volcker, a top economic adviser to President Obama, did not suggest lawmakers avoid entrusting the Fed with more responsibilities to reduce threats to the financial system. But his remarks before the Senate Banking Committee underlined concerns that such a move could dilute the Fed's traditional focus on monetary policy.

The Obama administration and lawmakers are now considering ways to revamp the nation's vast regulatory system, which proved ill-equipped to spot the weaknesses in the financial system that led to the current crisis. The Bush administration last year called for putting the Fed in charge of the stability of the financial system as a whole, and Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, has said he wants to pass a bill along those lines this spring.
>>>>

_________________
IT'S DIFFERENT THIS TIME


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Federal Reserve
PostPosted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:00 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 1678
Location: ENGLAND
Quote:
Panel: Bailout Overpaid $78B For Stocks
Feb. 6, 2009(CBS/AP) From a banker's perspective, it was a sweet deal.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/02/ ... 9473.shtml

The federal government's $700 billion financial rescue program has had its share of problems since it was introduced last fall. CBS News correspondent Priya David reports that that the Bush administration's Troubled Assets Relief Program (or TARP), created to purchase the illiquid assets of tottering financial firms, overpaid banks by billions of taxpayer dollars.

One of the big problems with TARP was how to value the toxic assets the banks were putting up in exchange for receiving bailout money.

A congressional oversight panel recently took a look at the first $254 billion the government spent buying shares of the big banks to keep them afloat. After six weeks of number-crunching, what did they find? The Treasury Department substantially overpaid for those assets, by a whopping $78 billion.

The panel said that in the fall, the government spent $254 billion on assets that were only worth $176 billion.

>>>>

_________________
IT'S DIFFERENT THIS TIME


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Federal Reserve
PostPosted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 7:39 pm 
Offline
Nationalised
User avatar

Joined: Jun 24, 2008
Posts: 9985
Location: South of the Border (Down Mexico Way)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 04081.html
Quote:
Fed's Expanded Market Role Fuels Fierce Debate
By Neil Irwin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, February 7, 2009

For 95 years, the Federal Reserve has been the nation's lender of last resort. Now it's becoming the lender of first resort.

Since the onset of the financial crisis, the Fed has used new, unconventional programs to indirectly make hundreds of billions of dollars available to people buying a house or a car or using a credit card, and to businesses large and small. The central bank, for instance, has pledged to make half a trillion dollars available for mortgages by buying packages of loans known as mortgage-backed securities.

To Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and the economists who embrace his strategy, the central bank is using creative approaches to try to contain the worst financial crisis in generations, exercising its authority to restart lending in a world in which private markets have all but shut down. Central banks around the world are starting to mimic the approach.

But the Fed is also now deciding how vast amounts of capital are deployed in the economy. Its actions so far have favored home buyers and consumers while doing much less prop up lending for businesses seeking to make long-term investments. Even analysts who support the Fed's actions say they have distorted investment decisions and emboldened elected officials to pressure the central bank in ways that undermine its independence.

"The Fed is socializing the capital markets," said Ethan Harris, an economist at Barclays Capital, who nonetheless said he believes the Fed's steps have been necessary. "You're creating a new class of welfare recipients. That's why it's extremely important that there be rules around transparency and lobbying, because the potential for abuse is high. And they have to exit out of this as quickly as markets allow them to."

.....(cont'd)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Federal Reserve
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 8:45 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 1678
Location: ENGLAND
Just been watching the US senators questioning US bankers on Bloomberg,it was sickening to watch the politicians pleading,grovelling to bankers,asking them was it not possible to reduce interest rates on credit cards to 9% from 25% as the very people who had contributed to the bailout of the same banks, would be most "graytfall if thayre burden was reduced,as many of my cownstichewnts would really bay haylped owt by such a consayshun". :evil: :evil: :evil:

These f%%%%%g cretins have the power to :
1)Punish the bastards who have caused these problems
2)To put the very directors they are grovelling to in jail for fraud
3)To change the legislation to prevent banks from issuing money at interest the government could issue at no cost,

and if anyone says politicians could or should not be entrusted to issue the states money,in all the worst case scenarios that could possibly materialise,what could be worse than the situtation that has been alowed to arise at present? :evil: :evil: :evil:

_________________
IT'S DIFFERENT THIS TIME


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Federal Reserve
PostPosted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:14 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 1678
Location: ENGLAND
Two hundred point surge in the Dow in the final hour attributed to the rumour of another govt plan to help people struggling to pay their mortgage,no details yet, but who in their right mind would carry on paying their mortgage if this ever came into force?


latest news
Quote:
OTS Director John Reich to step down Feb. 27
US Stocks Bounce Late On Mtge Report; DJIA Ends Off 7
By Rob Curran Last update: 5:24 p.m. EST Feb. 12, 2009
http://www.marketwatch.com

(Updated with company information, beginning in the 10th paragraph.)
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- U.S. stocks bounced late in the session Thursday, and most finished higher following a report that the U.S. government is mulling direct assistance to people who are behind on their mortgage payments, helping troubled banks such as Bank of America and Citigroup pare their losses.
Reuters reported the Obama administration is hammering out a program to subsidize mortgage payments for troubled homeowners who have gone through a repayment-means test, sources familiar with the plan said Thursday. Home-building and banking stocks sold off heavily for most of the session on disappointment that a tax break for home buyers was reduced in the final version of the economic-stimulus bill, agreed upon Wednesday. Banks are still laden with securities and derivatives tied directly to the housing market, and confidence in their solvency is sinking with home prices.
In one illustration of the tale of Thursday's tape, Toll Brothers was down as much as 6.2% before taking off in the last hour of trading to close higher by 9 cents, or 0.5%, to 18.46.
>>>

_________________
IT'S DIFFERENT THIS TIME


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Federal Reserve
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 2:06 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 1678
Location: ENGLAND
Good interview on the lost opportunity for reform in the US and how the banks are going to stay in control:

Quote:
the video: http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/02132009/watch.html

the transcript: http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/02132009/transcript1.html

Basicaly the government is going to throw away the opportunity to wrest control of the economy from these animals and even let them continue to draw their salaries and bonuses(paid for by tax payer bailouts) at the same time,if your blood pressure isn't off the scale when you have finished watching it then you are already dead.

Some pertinent extracts from the transcript-

BILL MOYERS: Are you saying that the banking industry trumps the president, the Congress and the American government when it comes to this issue so crucial to the survival of American democracy?

SIMON JOHNSON: I don't know. I hope they don't trump it. But the signs that I see this week, the body language, the words, the op-eds, the testimony, the way they're treated by certain Congressional committees, it makes me feel very worried.

......I have this feeling in my stomach that I felt in other countries, much poorer countries, countries that were headed into really difficult economic situation. When there's a small group of people who got you into a disaster, and who were still powerful. Disaster even made them more powerful. And you know you need to come in and break that power. And you can't. You're stuck.

The correct people you should be asking this question to are people at the IMF. And I can tell you what they're saying is the policy that we seem to be perusing, of being nice to the banks, is a mistake. The powerful people are the insiders. They're the CEOs of these banks. They're the people who run these banks. They're the people who pay themselves the massive bonuses at the end of the last year. Now, those bonuses are not the essence of the problem, but they are a symptom of an arrogance, and a feeling of invincibility, that tells you a lot about the culture of those organizations, and the attitudes of the people who lead them.

BILL MOYERS: Geithner has hired as his chief-of-staff, the lobbyist from Goldman Sachs. The new deputy secretary of state was, until last year, a CEO of Citigroup. Another CFO from Citigroup is now assistant to the president, and deputy national security advisor for International Economic Affairs. And one of his deputies also came from Citigroup. One new member of the president's Economic Recovery Advisory Board comes from UBS, which is being investigated for helping rich clients evade taxes.

BILL MOYERS: Do you think that Obama understands how these guys play the game? Let me play you the recording of a conference call "Huffington Post" released this week. One of the top officials of Morgan Stanley is speaking to his colleagues. Here it is......

....SIMON JOHNSON: What he's basically saying is business as usual. Go about your daily lives. Get the bonuses. Re-brand them as awards. But it really shows you the arrogance, and I think these people think that they've won. They think it's over. They think it's won. They think that we're going to pay out ten or 20 percent of GDP to basically make them whole. It's astonishing.

BILL MOYERS: Why wouldn't they believe that? I mean, when I watched the eight CEOs testify before Congress at the House Financial Services Committee earlier this week, I had just finished reading a report that almost every member of that Committee had received contributions from those banks last year. I mean in a way that's like paying the cop on the beat not to arrest you, right?


SIMON JOHNSON: I called up one of my friends on Capitol Hill after that testimony, and that session. I said, "What happened? This was your moment. Why did they pull their punches like that?" And my friend said, "They, the Committee members, know the bankers too well."

BILL MOYERS: Last year, the securities and investment industry made $146 million in campaign contributions. Commercial banks, another $34 million. I mean, American taxpayers don't have a flea's chance on a dog like that, do they?

SIMON JOHNSON: It a massive problem, obviously. And I do think, though, the good news there are people in the White House - I think the president himself, is aware of this broader issue. And, obviously, the campaign, the Obama campaign was very good at getting small contributions, and trying to minimize the impact of major donors like that.

But, at the same time, these people are throughout the system of government. They are very much at the forefront of the Treasury. The Treasury is apparently calling the shots on their economic policies. This is a decisive moment. Either you break the power or we're stuck for a long time with this arrangement.

BILL MOYERS: When Tim Geithner said, earlier in the week, that the American people have lost faith in some financial institutions and the government, did it occur to you that this was the same man who was president of the New York Fed through much of this debacle?

SIMON JOHNSON: I have no problem with poachers turning gamekeeper, right? So if you know where the bodies are buried maybe you can help us sort out the problem. And I did think the first three or four minutes of what Mr. Geithner said were very good.

As a definition of a problem, and pointing the finger clearly at the bankers, and saying that the government had been slow to react, and, of course, that included himself. I liked that. And then he started to talk about the specifics. And he said, "The compensation caps we've put in place, for the executives of these banks, are strong." And at that point I just fell out of my chair. That is not true. That is factually inaccurate, in my opinion.

BILL MOYERS: That?

SIMON JOHNSON: That this $500,000 limit, and deferred stock, is some kind of restriction on what they do? It's deferred stock, Bill. It's not restricted. You can get as much stock as you want, as soon as you pay back the government, you can cash out of that. That's one.

Second, you can, sorry to get technical, but reset the strike price. This is something you and your and your viewers, you need to hear this one out. Just look for these words, okay, follow them through the press. When you get into trouble, when your company goes down, and you have massive amounts of stock options that aren't worth much anymore, because the stock price has gone down, you say, "Oh, well, we're going to reset our option prices."

And, basically, it means that, at the end of the day, these people are going to walk away with tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars paid for by basically, insurance policy that you and I are providing.

Think of it like this, our taxpayer money is ensuring their bonuses. We're making sure that companies, that banks survive. And eventually, of course, the economy will turn around. Things will get better. The banks will be worth a lot of money. And they will cash out. And we will be paying higher taxes, we and our children, will be paying higher taxes so those people could have those bonuses. That's not fair. It's not acceptable. It's not even good economics.

BILL MOYERS: And, yet, Secretary Geithner's chief-of-staff is the former lobbyist for Goldman Sachs. How - serious question - how do they make a dispassionate judgment about how to deal with Goldman Sachs when they're so intertwined with Goldman Sachs' mindset?

SIMON JOHNSON: I have no idea. Of course, the administration, the new administration, has a lot of rules about lobbying. And they have rules that basically say, I think, as understood the rules, when they were first presented, I was very impressed. They basically said, "We're not going to hire lobbyists into the administration. There has to be some sort of cooling off period."

BILL MOYERS: And the next day Obama exempted a number of people from that very rule that he had just proclaimed.


SIMON JOHNSON: Yes. It's a problem. It's a huge problem.

BILL MOYERS: So here's the trillion dollar question that I take from your blog, that I read at the beginning, quote, "Can this person," your new economic strategist, in this case Geithner, "really break with the vested elite that got you into this much trouble?" Have you seen any evidence this week that he's going to be tough with these guys?

SIMON JOHNSON: I'm trying to be positive. I'm trying to be supportive. I like the administration. I voted for the president. The answer to your question is, no, I haven't seen anything. But you know, perhaps next week I will. But right now, as we speak, I have a bad feeling in my stomach.

My intuition, from crises, from situations that have improved, the situations that got worse, my intuition is that this is going to get a lot worse. It's going to cost us a lot more money. And we are going down a long, dark, blind alley.

_________________
IT'S DIFFERENT THIS TIME


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Federal Reserve
PostPosted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:24 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 1678
Location: ENGLAND
Warning to pinsters,reading the following article may induce uncontrollable laughter,symptoms maybe severe,considering recent events,you become hardened to shocking news and events,but then an article like this comes along and blows you away,and you really know the people in charge think of us as nothing more than pawns,and treat us with nothing but utter contempt,to think that they know that many people will actually believe it makes my blood boil.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aTlqZIct9xX0&refer=home

Quote:
Fed Signals Resolve to Avert Inflation Amid Stimulus (Update1)

By Steve Matthews

Feb. 19 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve policy makers signaled their determination to prevent any spiraling of inflation as a consequence of unprecedented U.S. fiscal stimulus and record growth in the central bank’s balance sheet.

Fed officials introduced long-term inflation projections yesterday, with most favoring a 2 percent rate. The forecasts will help moor the public’s expectations, Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said.

The step shows that Fed officials are intent on fulfilling their mandate to ensure price stability after the stock of money known as the monetary base soared 80 percent in the past six months. With long-term inflation expectations in household surveys hovering at 3 percent in that period, the surge in cash could threaten to send up bond yields, hindering efforts to generate an economic recovery by year-end.

“They are trying very hard to anchor inflation expectations,” said Stephen Stanley, chief economist at RBS Greenwich Capital Markets in Greenwich, Connecticut and a former Fed economist. With a credible objective, that may help people “have confidence the Fed will bring inflation into line.”

The inflation forecast, revealed yesterday in minutes of the Jan. 27-28 Federal Open Market Committee meeting, moves the Fed closer to adopting a formal inflation objective, a goal central banks in the euro region, the U.K. and other countries must observe in crafting interest-rate policies.
continued ->

_________________
IT'S DIFFERENT THIS TIME


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Federal Reserve
PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 12:53 am 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 1678
Location: ENGLAND
Bernanke was more angry about the bailout of AIG than any other episode in the recent crisis.Apparently they exploited a huge gap in the regulatory system,and there was no oversight of the financial products division,and by god,the company made huge numbers of irresponsible bets that produced huge losses.There was no regulatory oversight because there was a gap in the system!!!

Well thank f**k,in all this orgy of speculation and gambling,chaos,fraud and manipulation of the system the Wall St banks that own the Fed acted responsibly and with an appropriate degree of probity,otherwise old Benjamin might have had cause to get really mad.

You really couldn't make this stuff up could you?

Bernanke Says Insurer AIG Operated Like a Hedge Fund (Update3)

By Craig Torres and Hugh Son

March 3 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said American International Group Inc. operated like a hedge fund and having to rescue the insurer made him “more angry” than any other episode during the financial crisis.

“If there is a single episode in this entire 18 months that has made me more angry, I can’t think of one other than AIG,” Bernanke told lawmakers today. “AIG exploited a huge gap in the regulatory system, there was no oversight of the financial- products division, this was a hedge fund basically that was attached to a large and stable insurance company.”

Bernanke’s comments foreshadow tougher oversight of systemically important financial firms, and come as President Barack Obama seeks legislative proposals within weeks for a regulatory overhaul. The U.S. government has had to deepen its commitment to prevent AIG’s collapse three times since September as the company accumulated the worst losses of any U.S. company.

The company “made huge numbers of irresponsible bets, took huge losses, there was no regulatory oversight because there was a gap in the system,” Bernanke said. At the same time, officials “had no choice but to try and stabilize the system” by aiding the firm.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aHx9vZa0IJAo&refer=home

_________________
IT'S DIFFERENT THIS TIME


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Federal Reserve
PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:22 am 
Offline
Nationalised
User avatar

Joined: Jun 24, 2008
Posts: 9985
Location: South of the Border (Down Mexico Way)
"murf" posted a link to the PBS Frontline programme "Inside the Meltdown:
viewtopic.php?f=15&t=18867&p=209939&#p209939
murf wrote:
I just wached this programme on PBS.

A bit long but worthwhile.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/meltdown/view/


Well worth a watch - but you can go straight to part 4 which shows how letting Lehman's fail blew up AIG.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 390 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 26  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to: