Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 119 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: You're charging how much?
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:14 am 
Offline
Too Big to Fail
User avatar

Joined: Jan 20, 2009
Posts: 3240
Location: My imagination
'If this is signed, it's like signing away the Irish economy for the next ten years,' he concludes.

_________________
“The only calibration that counts is how much heart people invest, how much they ignore their fears of being hurt or caught out or humiliated. And the only thing people regret is that they didn't live boldly enough, that they didn't invest enough heart, didn't love enough. Nothing else really counts at all.” Ted Hughes

“And the day came when the risk to remain tight in a bud was more painful than the risk it took to blossom.” Anais Nin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You're charging how much?
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:15 am 
Offline
Property Magnate

Joined: Jun 30, 2008
Posts: 662
Location: Dublin
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/11/in-rare-agreement-with-krugman-onerous.html

Quote:
All these questions "Is the rate 4.7%, 5.2%, or 6.7% and if so for who long and on what portion?" are complete silliness.

ANY Rate is Onerous.

...

Irish citizens cannot afford to rescue German, UK, and French banks stupid enough to bet on bubbles in Ireland. It should be the creditors' problem not the problem of Irish citizens.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You're charging how much?
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:23 am 
Offline
Nationalised

Joined: Sep 13, 2007
Posts: 27170
Location: Tullamore
Kate P wrote:
'If this is signed, it's like signing away the Irish economy for the next ten years,' he concludes.

It is also the inevitable result of guaranteeing the debts of insolvent banks. The dogs on the 'pin knew, not just suspected, but knew on a rational basis of a collapsing property bubble given the exposure of the banks to property, the banks were insolvent. There's a thread on each of them from early-mid 2008.

The stock markets certainly knew; how else do you explain the share price slide?

Yet a blanket guarantee was imposed and supported... tay and garlic have a lot to answer for.

In Mr. McWilliam's defence, if a resolution of the banks had swiftly followed the guarantee, perhaps the fallout wouldn't be so bad, but it didn't and it still hasn't. That is always a risk when dealing with can kickers and incompetents.

_________________
"It is impossible to design a system so perfect that no one needs to be good."

So long and thanks for all the fish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You're charging how much?
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:30 am 
Offline
Nationalised
User avatar

Joined: Jun 24, 2008
Posts: 9985
Location: South of the Border (Down Mexico Way)
everybody knows wrote:
I figure this is all bullshit . Throw out a figure and shock and frighten the nation . Then more meetings late into the night at government buildings . There is always late night meetings in government buildings . Burning the midnight oil while trashing out a deal with the unions . Then Bertie or Cowen emerges with a deal that was nothing like what the ' sources ' leaked .

This is standard Irish government tactics when trying to scare the shit out of the Irish people .

I thought that when they annouced the guarantee.

I thought that when they annouced the inital amount to bail out Anglo.

I thought that when they annouced the "final" amount to bail out the banks.

These guys are fucking muppets who could agree to anything and then swear blind it was the best deal on offer and not taking it would have dire consequences, blah, blah, blah.

Any IR over 3% is trying to push water uphill - unless they are planning a massive negotiation coup, and knocking the Greek deal out of the park (skills they haven't shown so far!) then any number north of 3 is a failure.

We went through the looking glass a long time ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You're charging how much?
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:38 am 
Offline
Of Systemic Importance
User avatar

Joined: May 13, 2008
Posts: 6758
Location: Somewhere up in the hills
+1 WGU. There really is no indication that the Irish government has a coherent strategy or that they are acting in the interest of the people.

I assume the 6.7% is a prelude for a default announcement on Sunday night. It has to be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You're charging how much?
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:44 am 
Offline
Too Big to Fail

Joined: Mar 2, 2007
Posts: 3814
Coles2 wrote:
+1 WGU. There really is no indication that the Irish government has a coherent strategy or that they are acting in the interest of the people.

I assume the 6.7% is a prelude for a default announcement on Sunday night. It has to be.



Sunday night? Meaning we're pulling out of the Euro, bank account controls to be put in place, etc? I can't see that (at least I hope you're wrong) so soon but "6.7% was the best on offer and so we're defaulting....."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You're charging how much?
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:59 am 
Offline
Planning Tribunal Attendee

Joined: Jun 5, 2008
Posts: 1485
Cant see us defaulting, not a notion.
If the 2 brians default on Sunday night, I will forgive them for everything.
Sunday night will decide for me whether I re load on ammunition and head out to eastern Europe to learn some new skills or just get the flock out of here....

_________________
What condition was the property in for each of the properties you are saying the bottom is in for!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You're charging how much?
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 12:00 pm 
Offline
Too Big to Fail
User avatar

Joined: Jun 28, 2008
Posts: 4430
I'm not buying 6.7%. It simply does not make any sense for anyone.

And really, September 29th 2008 wasn't the problem (I am not entirely unwilling to accept that the vista was too appalling that night for less than what they did). The problem is what in the name of electrical jumpin' Jesus they were doing for the 6 months before that. Did they really not know Anglo was fucked during those 6 months? I made my parents take their life savings out of Irish banks in Spring '08, and my economics knowledge stretches to a B in leaving cert economics back in the dark ages of the last millennium. And they didn't see it? That stretches credulity to beyond breaking point for me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You're charging how much?
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 12:03 pm 
Offline
Too Big to Fail

Joined: Mar 2, 2007
Posts: 3814
Larry wrote:
I'm not buying 6.7%. It simply does not make any sense for anyone.

And really, September 29th 2008 wasn't the problem (I am not entirely unwilling to accept that the vista was too appalling that night for less than what they did). The problem is what in the name of electrical jumpin' Jesus they were doing for the 6 months before that. Did they really not know Anglo was fucked during those 6 months? I made my parents take their life savings out of Irish banks in Spring '08, and my economics knowledge stretches to a B in leaving cert economics back in the dark ages of the last millennium. And they didn't see it? That stretches credulity to beyond breaking point for me.



Inclined to agree. Sub 6% most likely, imo.

No, I've changed my mind. I don't know wtf is going on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You're charging how much?
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 12:55 pm 
Offline
Migrant

Joined: Nov 21, 2010
Posts: 2
An odd viewpoint, perhaps, but is it possible that the movers and shakers in Germany etc are merely trying to push the country into taking the default option thus solving any potential future political problems at home?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You're charging how much?
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:16 pm 
Offline
Planning Tribunal Attendee

Joined: Nov 9, 2009
Posts: 1462
Location: Doorway of an old Hotel
What Goes Up... wrote:
everybody knows wrote:
I figure this is all bullshit . Throw out a figure and shock and frighten the nation . Then more meetings late into the night at government buildings . There is always late night meetings in government buildings . Burning the midnight oil while trashing out a deal with the unions . Then Bertie or Cowen emerges with a deal that was nothing like what the ' sources ' leaked .

This is standard Irish government tactics when trying to scare the shit out of the Irish people .

I thought that when they annouced the guarantee.

I thought that when they annouced the inital amount to bail out Anglo.

I thought that when they annouced the "final" amount to bail out the banks.

These guys are fucking muppets who could agree to anything and then swear blind it was the best deal on offer and not taking it would have dire consequences, blah, blah, blah.

Any IR over 3% is trying to push water uphill - unless they are planning a massive negotiation coup, and knocking the Greek deal out of the park (skills they haven't shown so far!) then any number north of 3 is a failure.

We went through the looking glass a long time ago.


They have worn you down . The rate will be low . They have to get something right at some stage of their miserable existance . They also have the expertise of Honohan at hand .

How will they clean up the banks ? I guess there will be a NAMA for small distressed loans / mortgages .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You're charging how much?
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:21 pm 
Offline
Nationalised
User avatar

Joined: Jun 24, 2008
Posts: 9985
Location: South of the Border (Down Mexico Way)
everybody knows wrote:
They have worn you down . The rate will be low . They have to get something right at some stage of their miserable existance . They also have the expertise of Honohan at hand .

How will they clean up the banks ? I guess there will be a NAMA for small distressed loans / mortgages .

Eamon Ryan on RTE Radio now saying Greece only borrowed for 3 years and we should borrow for longer - because of that we will be paying more than Greece (5.2%) but less than the 6.7% "being bandied about".

I'm not worn down - I just couldn't give a shit about whether it's 6.7 or 5.2 - anything over 3 is debt upon debt with interest on the interest.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You're charging how much?
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:48 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Oct 9, 2007
Posts: 2053
FB2 wrote:
Either that or it has as much fiscal sense as the Treaty of Versailles. Watch out for that Danny Healy Rae Fella.



Moore McDowell on about the treaty of Versailles.

Give us a wave Moore. 8DD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You're charging how much?
PostPosted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 6:05 pm 
Offline
Of Systemic Importance
User avatar

Joined: Nov 6, 2006
Posts: 6808
Location: Australia
maybe they want us to default

_________________
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=2281&p=374552&hilit=IMF+database#p374552
^^DOOM ^^


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You're charging how much?
PostPosted: Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:59 pm 
Offline
Speculator

Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Posts: 438
namawinelake just tweeted this:
Quote:
BBC reporting ~€30bn from IMF at 4%, ~€30bn from EFSF at 5% and ~€30bn from EFSM at 6%


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 119 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to: