Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Childrens Hospital Refused Planning
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:39 pm 
Offline
Neo Landlord

Joined: Feb 1, 2010
Posts: 277
Location: Stillorgan
sorehead wrote:
Also I'm slightly amused that Dublin people seem to think it's a bigger deal to travel from the M50 to city center than it is from say Listowel up to the M50.

So yeah put the hospital in an isolated IKEA type location, rather than a vibrant city center where family and friends can meet up for lunch, take breaks from the hospital, take kids on little excursions etc.. Nothing more important than being just off the M50.

I worked in one of the existing children's hospitals for 4 years and talked to hundreds of parents throughout that. I can safely say that for the mother who left Donegal at 4:30am to make an outpatient appointment in our hospital, the extra 30+minutes it would take to get to the Mater does make a huge difference. I can safely say that for my girlfriends family who recently had to bring their son up Crumlin (from beside Listowel amusingly enough) for outpatient appointments, not spending another 40+minutes each way stuck in traffic did make a huge difference.

If you believe parents of sick children care about "meeting friends for lunch, taking breaks from the hospital and taking their sick kids on little excursions" over access, facilities and quality of life at the hospital (i.e. parking, facilities for parents/families to sleep, green space etc) then you're sadly, terribly, mistaken.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Childrens Hospital Refused Planning
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:59 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Aug 2, 2009
Posts: 1513
That pompous hairy arse Reilly called a so-called review that did not have within its terms of reference a review of the location, just of the fitness of purpose of the proposed building. He was warned about likely An Bord Pleanala objections and yet pursued a stupid path.

It was an obvious politically motivated mindless decision: Harney's sop to Ahern. You had he Bertie Bowl and now you have the Bertie Sick Bowl.

Among many other lessons that will not be learned from this disaster is that it is a classic example of sunk cost fallacy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Childrens Hospital Refused Planning
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:02 pm 
Offline
Property Magnate

Joined: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 609
Imper wrote:
.
If you believe parents of sick children care about "meeting friends for lunch, taking breaks from the hospital and taking their sick kids on little excursions" over access, facilities and quality of life at the hospital (i.e. parking, facilities for parents/families to sleep, green space etc) then you're sadly, terribly, mistaken.


Well perhaps but I'm speaking from my own experience, where pretending to have some sort of semi-normal life was very important for the patient and the heavily stressed relatives.

But yeah depends on how sick etc. and everyone is different.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Childrens Hospital Refused Planning
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:32 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Nov 20, 2008
Posts: 1593
If you were building a fucking bungalow you would talk to planners before you lifted a finger to see what they make of your back of napkin sketches. This stinks, though I think it is the right decision.

Did nobody really bother to see what the planners thought, or did they put their hands over their ears and assume it was just too big to fail?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Childrens Hospital Refused Planning
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:35 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Dec 28, 2006
Posts: 2732
did anyone champion this other than Bertie?
Bertie wanted something for his constituency.
nobody appears to know where to fingerpoint.
I point the finger at the autocratic fucktard.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Childrens Hospital Refused Planning
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:44 am 
Offline
Neo Landlord

Joined: Feb 1, 2010
Posts: 277
Location: Stillorgan
dipole wrote:
did anyone champion this other than Bertie?
Bertie wanted something for his constituency.
nobody appears to know where to fingerpoint.
I point the finger at the autocratic fucktard.

Bertie wanted it, Harney fully supported it. Other than that, there was never much public or clinical backing for the NCH at the Mater.

Quote:
The matter is even more complex because Prof Drumm worked in Crumlin until last summer and was a leading advocate for its redevelopment as well as the overall re-organisation of children's hospital services. His €180,000-a-year press adviser, Karl Anderson, was also one of the founders of the parents' group which formed to lobby for the re-building of Crumlin.

However, once Drumm became CEO of the HSE he was suddenly a huge proponent of the NCH at the Mater as was Karl Anderson.

Funny what giving someone a job can do to change their strongly held opinions.

Each and every report was biased from its inception for a variety of reasons unfortunately. After €35m on planning and consultancy, we still don't truly know the costs, benefits and drawbacks of placing the NCH at several types of locations in Dublin.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Childrens Hospital Refused Planning
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:49 am 
Offline
Real Estate Developer

Joined: Apr 29, 2009
Posts: 773
Location: South County Dublin
23rdbuchan wrote:
If you were building a fucking bungalow you would talk to planners before you lifted a finger to see what they make of your back of napkin sketches. This stinks, though I think it is the right decision.

Did nobody really bother to see what the planners thought, or did they put their hands over their ears and assume it was just too big to fail?


Haven't been following this closely enough but do I get the impression that they used the new Strategic Infrastructure process which bypasses the councils as planning authority and goes straight to ABP? Do I guess that they carried over the no-lobbying process around ABP into this expanded role? i.e. not only is there no mechanism for pre-decision consultations but it might even be illegal.
Just speculation on my part - anyone know?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Childrens Hospital Refused Planning
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 4:33 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation
User avatar

Joined: Aug 27, 2011
Posts: 2001
Location: Local bubble zone
Duisigh wrote:
I applaud this decision, ABP are recently showing a huge amount of sense. Far better to greenfield out by Saggart ( LUAS, M50 )



here are some of the highlights of the inspectors report

Quote:
The travel times from the M1, N2, N3 and N4 at peak time vary from 32 minutes to 38 with the off peak times 10 to 14 minutes. From the N7 the peak time is 41.8 minutes with off peak 17 minutes.


anyone ever get down the M1 in 38 mins?

Quote:
There are no options in respect of increasing space provision to either patients or staff if the concerns I have outlined above are realised. Therefore, I consider that the parking provision which is considered to be sustainable within a city centre location would be inadequate to facilitate the effective operation of the proposed development.

_________________
Qi hu nan xia: When one rides a tiger, it is difficult to dismount.
House prices are cyclical, no nation has ever lived through a perpetual house price expansion or contraction.
Money is a public good; as such, it lends itself to private exploitation - CP Kindleberger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Childrens Hospital Refused Planning
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 5:06 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation
User avatar

Joined: Aug 21, 2009
Posts: 2777
Location: Mesopotatia
23rdbuchan wrote:
If you were building a fucking bungalow you would talk to planners before you lifted a finger to see what they make of your back of napkin sketches. This stinks, though I think it is the right decision.


Surely they would have hired planning consultants after an open competition for tender, and would probably have had to draft an Environmental Impact Assessment of some description. I haven't a clue who they hired though.

Perhaps their contribution was as simple as:
Children's hospital committee: We've saved you the hassle and drafted a visual impact report for you. Sign here please
Planning Consultant: No problemo. Can I have my fee now?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Childrens Hospital Refused Planning
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 5:56 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation
User avatar

Joined: Aug 27, 2011
Posts: 2001
Location: Local bubble zone
Dubhgeannain wrote:
23rdbuchan wrote:
If you were building a fucking bungalow you would talk to planners before you lifted a finger to see what they make of your back of napkin sketches. This stinks, though I think it is the right decision.


Surely they would have hired planning consultants after an open competition for tender, and would probably have had to draft an Environmental Impact Assessment of some description. I haven't a clue who they hired though.

Perhaps their contribution was as simple as:
Children's hospital committee: We've saved you the hassle and drafted a visual impact report for you. Sign here please
Planning Consultant: No problemo. Can I have my fee now?


AFAIK Murray O'Laoire Architect won the lead contract ....... and promptly went bankrupt
dont know who replaced them

_________________
Qi hu nan xia: When one rides a tiger, it is difficult to dismount.
House prices are cyclical, no nation has ever lived through a perpetual house price expansion or contraction.
Money is a public good; as such, it lends itself to private exploitation - CP Kindleberger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Childrens Hospital Refused Planning
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:19 pm 
Offline
Nationalised

Joined: Sep 13, 2007
Posts: 27309
Location: Tullamore
fishfoodie wrote:
And also because in Ireland, the center of the city is the only place served by public transport. So for families coming up from the country on the train, would be fecked trying to get out to Lucan or where ever, if the arrived into Heuston.

Nobody brings a sick child up to Dublin from the country on the train. Just like people don't go to James' for their cancer treatment by public transport.

Besides which, James' is a short hop on the Luas from Heuston and Connelly...

James' would seem to be the ideal location transport wise - it is not a million miles away from Crumlin Children's (so close in fact that one wonders if they could be administratively considered co-located...). On the other hand, the Coombe is moving out to Tallaght and one of the pre-reqs of the new site was supposed to be that it was co-located with a maternity hospital...

_________________
"It is impossible to design a system so perfect that no one needs to be good."

So long and thanks for all the fish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Childrens Hospital Refused Planning
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:24 am 
Offline
Too Big to Fail

Joined: Aug 4, 2007
Posts: 4618
Location: Ahernistan
yoganmahew wrote:
fishfoodie wrote:
And also because in Ireland, the center of the city is the only place served by public transport. So for families coming up from the country on the train, would be fecked trying to get out to Lucan or where ever, if the arrived into Heuston.

Nobody brings a sick child up to Dublin from the country on the train. Just like people don't go to James' for their cancer treatment by public transport.

Besides which, James' is a short hop on the Luas from Heuston and Connelly...

James' would seem to be the ideal location transport wise - it is not a million miles away from Crumlin Children's (so close in fact that one wonders if they could be administratively considered co-located...). On the other hand, the Coombe is moving out to Tallaght and one of the pre-reqs of the new site was supposed to be that it was co-located with a maternity hospital...


Probably not. But if you've a sick kid in a hospital & your visiting them daily, they might not drive up every day, not if one parent has to get to work every day, then the other has to get in to visit.

No major hospital in Dublin should be more than one-hop via public transport from a mainline station like Heuston or Connelly. If a hospital doesn't have plentiful & free car parking, which no hospital in Dublin has; then it needs to have excellent & short public transport links.

Ultimately for parents the problem is not where the hospital is, within certain limits, but the quality of care their child gets, & how quickly they get it.

Right now we will have the worst of all worlds, a slow, undersized & half-assed childrens hospital, with no critical element done well. Not well staffed, not easily accessed & undersized. There's acres of land out where the Bertie bowl was originally intended to be built, its off the M50, its relatively easily accessible. I don't understand why the Dail can't pass a bill designating a part of the area a 'special development zone' & just exclude it from regular planning laws & just get the fucking hospital built :!: :!: :!:

I listened to the clowns waffling about how it shouldn't be a big deal to just change the original plans & reduce it from a 5xx room building to a 4xx room building & how it was no big deal :roll: Now, as an Engineer, I have a pretty low opinion of architechs, but even I know that reducing a building plan by 20% takes a little more than a few hours, & the idea that something that previously took a few years can now be done in a couple of months a gigantic pile of shit :!: :!: :!: :!:

I'm sick of hearing how the Democratic process must be observed, when we all know that ABP was set up to allow the TDs & councillors to fuck about with the process while appearing to keep their hands clean. ABP is a bunch of asshole marionets who need to be told what the desired result is before they can make a decision :roll:

_________________
"Mr Kelly said Ireland’s “reputational capital” had been damaged by “chancers” such as ex-Anglo Irish Bank chairman Seán FitzPatrick, who had been abetted by “buffoons” such as former financial regulator Patrick Neary, Minister for Finance Brian Lenihan and the Taoiseach." - Irish Times 13th Jan 2009

"If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to be a horrible warning." (Catherine Aird)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Childrens Hospital Refused Planning
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:14 am 
Offline
Of Systemic Importance
User avatar

Joined: Nov 6, 2006
Posts: 6856
Location: Australia
They refused it because it would "negatively impact on the skyline of Dublin"...........!

WOW

sorehead wrote:
This has nothing to do with medical decisions, traffic or any sort of logic, it's to do with preserving Dublin's "skyline".

Dublin (or any Irish city really) does not really have a skyline to protect, there's a reason that the traditional skyline picture of Dublin is the Poolbeg chimneys, or maybe now the National Convention Center.

In fairness the ABP were doing their job - not allowing changes to a bland skyline, but this shouldn't have been their job to do. Those clowns out at the DAA can pretty much build any old rubbish they want without involving the ABP, why the hell should something as fundamental as a children's hospital be held up by 3 ABP staffers on purely aesthetic, chin stroking reasons.

Also I'm slightly amused that Dublin people seem to think it's a bigger deal to travel from the M50 to city center than it is from say Listowel up to the M50.

So yeah put the hospital in an isolated IKEA type location, rather than a vibrant city center where family and friends can meet up for lunch, take breaks from the hospital, take kids on little excursions etc.. Nothing more important than being just off the M50.

+1

Why is everyone on about traffic & trains? It got rejected because the planners dont like how it will look

_________________
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=2281&p=374552&hilit=IMF+database#p374552
^^DOOM ^^


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Childrens Hospital Refused Planning
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:44 am 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Jun 16, 2007
Posts: 2028
Location: Oighearland
this NCH has already cost the state 35m . no doubt in over the top consultancy fees for muppets who deliver shag-all.

I'm all for a NCH, but wasting 35m before a sod is overturned is a fucking scandal, the HSE has a habit of paying large euros to professional consultants as in the PPARS scam.

what could we have got for 35m?
35m could fund 350 small business ideas through enterprise ireland or 10 big disruptive industrial/academic research projects through SFI, an extra 10 yoyos in everyone's back pocket. It probably cost each family 50 quid, its like handing the parasites a large birthday gift.

ABP should be part of the design process and their guidelines should be known by the so-called professional bodies. Everyone involved in this scam should be liable for failing to comply with ABP guidelines.

Wasnt NAMA-cheerleader Harry Crosbie the developer involved in building this NCH?

_________________
advice to future unemployed TDs at the next general election: dont look at it as a failure, see it as an opportunity to 'upskill'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Childrens Hospital Refused Planning
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:36 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Aug 10, 2010
Posts: 2565
fishfoodie wrote:
yoganmahew wrote:
fishfoodie wrote:
And also because in Ireland, the center of the city is the only place served by public transport. So for families coming up from the country on the train, would be fecked trying to get out to Lucan or where ever, if the arrived into Heuston.

Nobody brings a sick child up to Dublin from the country on the train. Just like people don't go to James' for their cancer treatment by public transport.

Besides which, James' is a short hop on the Luas from Heuston and Connelly...

James' would seem to be the ideal location transport wise - it is not a million miles away from Crumlin Children's (so close in fact that one wonders if they could be administratively considered co-located...). On the other hand, the Coombe is moving out to Tallaght and one of the pre-reqs of the new site was supposed to be that it was co-located with a maternity hospital...


I'm sick of hearing how the Democratic process must be observed, when we all know that ABP was set up to allow the TDs & councillors to fuck about with the process while appearing to keep their hands clean. ABP is a bunch of asshole marionets who need to be told what the desired result is before they can make a decision :roll:


Who told them to turn the application down? Perhaps it was FF?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to: