Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: So, Just How Corrupt Was The Planning Process?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:52 am 
Offline
Planning Tribunal Attendee

Joined: Jan 25, 2007
Posts: 1323
Do people think there is overzoning - or underzoning?
There seem to be different people who argue different positions.

Doing work in the environs of cities, I do know that there is massive pressure by people who want to build their own large house on a big field. It is bad for the environment - and degrades the spaces between towns, increases traffic, reduces the quality of potential services, makes it bad for pedestrians etc. etc.
For people who are against "local needs" clauses - what do you propose? A free for all?

What I think should be done is that there should be greater access to zoned land which is sold off in decent sized plots - to avoid the ugly housing estates of similar houses that are done. The competition would also force developers to improve.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: So, Just How Corrupt Was The Planning Process?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:17 am 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation
User avatar

Joined: Aug 27, 2011
Posts: 2001
Location: Local bubble zone
yoganmahew wrote:
Sugar beet? The field next to me was full of it last year and says you are wrong. Perhaps you should go to the countryside sometime.

Hedgerows? What do you think surrounds the one-off houses? As I say, there's nothing as sterile as a field of crops.

No argument about septic tanks, as I say, it's a matter for regulation. There's a solution to every problem, no matter the expense. The solution should be imposed.


I stand corrected - it is possible that sugar beet may be grown in Ireland
http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/20 ... een-saved/
http://www.askaboutireland.ie/reading-r ... e-farming/

It definitely is not grown in any quantity
People often refer to Fodder Beet as Sugar Beet -they are virtually the same


In relation to hedgerows around one off houses - they are in the vast majority are non native plants - Leylandia, Beech etc
I have never seen a species rich hedgerow planted around a house
IMHO industrial production of crops should be allowed provided some areas are kept.

Quote:
This habitat (hedgerows) is an important reservoir for native plant diversity. Fieldwork revealed 144 species of plants of which 99 were native Irish species. Typical native hedgerow plants include hawthorn, ash, blackthorn, elder, wild rose, holly, cow-parsley, false oat, lords and ladies, cleavers, herb-robert, wood avens, hogweed and lesser celandine. The dominant tree is the non-native sycamore. Other more rarely occurring hedgerow plants are crab apple, oak, hazel, primrose, dog violet and ground ivy.
The condition of hedgerows ranges from species rich, intact hedgerows to remnants which contain few native species. Management is the key factor in determining their quality and management is urgently required to ensure their survival. Principal threats to hedgerows are building and road construction.

http://www.hedgelaying.ie/images/1254465141.pdf

http://www.roscommoncoco.ie/en/Services ... pecies.pdf


The real problem with septic tanks is not the regulations as they stand rather enforcement. We are great in this country for regulation but brutal on enforcement.
I have seen one off house owners who have basically run a pipe from the septic tank directly to the nearest stream/drainage ditch. In Connemara for example, most septic tanks are constructed on peat/peaty soil and in effect sewage flows from the septic tank to the stream without further treatment.

http://www.wte-ltd.co.uk/septictank.html
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ire ... 20005.html

In areas of the Burren SAC one off housing has been permitted adjacent low nutrient turloughs without proper consideration of the impacts.

In many areas there is insufficient drainage - I think the figure is about 40% of the island. The only remedy is the likes of constructed wetland systems.
The solutions will not be easy but improvements are needed.

If proper enforcement was implemented some limited one off housing should be allowed.

_________________
Qi hu nan xia: When one rides a tiger, it is difficult to dismount.
House prices are cyclical, no nation has ever lived through a perpetual house price expansion or contraction.
Money is a public good; as such, it lends itself to private exploitation - CP Kindleberger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: So, Just How Corrupt Was The Planning Process?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:41 am 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation
User avatar

Joined: Aug 27, 2011
Posts: 2001
Location: Local bubble zone
75% of Dingle land designated for housing to be dezoned

Quote:
More than three-quarters of land designated for housing in Dingle town and surrounding areas during the economic boom is to be dezoned.
Under a new area plan for most of the Dingle Peninsula, Kerry Co Council is proposing to reduce the amount of already-zoned land from 195 acres to 45 acres.

However, there is still some pressure on the council to retain residential zoning in Dingle for parcels of land or to rezone other land as residential. The owner of 11 acres at The Grove, Dingle, for example, is seeking to retain residential zoning for the land to meet the housing needs of an extended family.

However, senior planning engineer Paul Stack voiced concerns that some of the land could be used for tourism and leisure purposes, or a caravan park, which would be suitable in a scenic area.

The issue arose during a special meeting to consider a new Dingle local area plan for 2012 to 2018, which would be used as part of the future planning process for large tracts of land in and around Dingle town for housing.

A "dezoning" process is currently underway in Dingle and other towns in Kerry. More than 5,000 acres in the county, excluding the urban areas of Tralee, Killarney and Listowel, were zoned for housing, with only a quarter of the land being serviced for development.

Kerry councillors zoned enough land for 61,269 housing units — about six times more than what was needed for the population, according to data from the Department of Environment.

The amendments to the new Dingle plan, decided by councillors, will be published later this month and will be put out for a four-week period of public consultation. It is hoped to bring the plan back before the council in June.

Council management has stated that future residential zonings in Dingle will only be considered on infill land, or brownfield sites, or on lands close to existing residential areas.


http://buckplanning.blogspot.com/2012/0 ... d-for.html

_________________
Qi hu nan xia: When one rides a tiger, it is difficult to dismount.
House prices are cyclical, no nation has ever lived through a perpetual house price expansion or contraction.
Money is a public good; as such, it lends itself to private exploitation - CP Kindleberger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: So, Just How Corrupt Was The Planning Process?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:12 am 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation

Joined: Aug 2, 2009
Posts: 1513
Wood and trees guys. Wood and fucking trees.

Once-off houses, while an obvious symptom, is just a minor rash when compared to the real disease of numbers of permitted units.

From 2001 to 2010 there were 1,197,886 housing units approved of which 163,094 were once-off and 1,034,792 were in multi-unit developments. Once-off houses can be holiday homes, homes for children of land-owners and others. While once-off houses, especially large gaudy MuckMansions, are focussed on by groups like An Taisce as being damaging to rural landscape, the real issue in planning is the permitting of developments.

One million non-once-off housing units in just ten years that were designed by architects, submitted for review and approval by so-called professional planners and then approved.

Rezoned land means planning permission can be granted to build units. Lane is rezoned by council votes. Plenty of scope for corruption there. The owner of the rezoned land must then engage with architects, create and submit detailed building plans that are then inexplicably approved.

Whether the units are subsequently built is somewhat irrelevant. At this stage, the planning process has fundamentlaly failed. There is obviously still scope at this stage for incompetence and corruption as shoddily built units are approved for habitation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: So, Just How Corrupt Was The Planning Process?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:00 am 
Offline
Planning Tribunal Attendee
User avatar

Joined: Nov 13, 2006
Posts: 1417
discostu wrote:
Take a particular bow Clare Cork and especially Donegal

Quote:
An Taisce found Donegal had about 2,250 hectares of residential land in 2010, enough for a population increase of 180,000. However, half of planning permissions over the past decade were granted on unzoned land.

Ennis in Clare was cited as an example of some of the most "senseless zoning excesses" of the Celtic Tiger.

Almost 4,500 acres of land was zoned for development, enough to increase the town’s population from 26,000 to over 100,000.

In one instance, zoned land sold by a farmer for €18.8m was later refused planning permission because it was on a flood plain. Although Ennis was one of the worst affected areas by flooding in 2009, and only needed a maximum of 175 acres, the Department of the Environment encountered "significant difficulties" from councillors in seeking to get this land de-zoned.

The worst three areas for residential over-zoning were Clare, Co Cork (2,500 hectares) and Donegal (2,250 hectares), which between them accounted for 20% of the national stock of residentially zoned land in 2010.

An Taisce spokesman Charles Stanley-Smith said the legacy of bad planning would haunt society for generations. "Bad planning is not victim free. The analysis shows that there is a very strong correlation between councils that have scored poorly and a range of negative socioeconomic and environmental outcomes."


For much of the land zoned for residential usage there was never an intention to build property on it. The rezoning took place so that when a proposed bypass was built was approved the land would have to be compulsory purchased at a far higher value.

This was a great scam altogether. The money would come from the NRA so any right minded Councillor would see it as their duty to get this cash into the local area.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: So, Just How Corrupt Was The Planning Process?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:06 pm 
Online
Nationalised

Joined: Sep 13, 2007
Posts: 27178
Location: Tullamore
johnnyone234 wrote:
yoganmahew wrote:
Sugar beet? The field next to me was full of it last year and says you are wrong. Perhaps you should go to the countryside sometime.

Hedgerows? What do you think surrounds the one-off houses? As I say, there's nothing as sterile as a field of crops.

No argument about septic tanks, as I say, it's a matter for regulation. There's a solution to every problem, no matter the expense. The solution should be imposed.


I stand corrected - it is possible that sugar beet may be grown in Ireland
http://www.irisheconomy.ie/index.php/20 ... een-saved/
http://www.askaboutireland.ie/reading-r ... e-farming/

It definitely is not grown in any quantity
People often refer to Fodder Beet as Sugar Beet -they are virtually the same

Possible? Possible?

You're having a laugh. I didn't say it was grown for sugar, it is grown for fodder. Sugar beet (as opposed to fodder beet) is grown because it has a higher sugar content and so has a particular feed niche. Aside from that, it plays an important part as a cash crop in a rotation.

Quote:
In relation to hedgerows around one off houses - they are in the vast majority are non native plants - Leylandia, Beech etc
I have never seen a species rich hedgerow planted around a house

You are confusing 'like' with 'habitat'. I don't like leylandii either, but they provide an excellent nesting habitat and winter protection for birds.

I suggest you haven't looked too hard for species rich hedgerows around houses. I also suggest you should look again at what passes for hedgerows maintained by farmers at the insistence of councils. Pathetic buzzcut mounds of dead and dying trees over-run with bramble. Oh, but wait, we can't have the cars of those urban dwellers scratched as they speed from town to town.

Quote:
IMHO industrial production of crops should be allowed provided some areas are kept.

Well, gee, doff of the cap from the rural dwellers, thanks so much.

Quote:
The real problem with septic tanks is not the regulations as they stand rather enforcement. We are great in this country for regulation but brutal on enforcement.

Too true, that's why I said the solution should be imposed...

_________________
"It is impossible to design a system so perfect that no one needs to be good."

So long and thanks for all the fish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: So, Just How Corrupt Was The Planning Process?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:18 pm 
Offline
Too Big to Fail
User avatar

Joined: Apr 1, 2010
Posts: 3745
My planning permission for my one-off stipulated that I had to plant native species. I still haven't gotten around to planting anything but I kept the original boundary untouched -- hawthorn, holly etc. Lots of small bird species around, among other wildlife.

_________________
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" – Neils Bohr
"If something cannot go on forever, it will stop" – Herbert Stein
"Einstein, stop telling God what to do" – Neils Bohr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: So, Just How Corrupt Was The Planning Process?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:43 pm 
Offline
Of Systemic Importance
User avatar

Joined: Nov 6, 2006
Posts: 6808
Location: Australia
superman wrote:
Do people think there is overzoning - or underzoning?
There seem to be different people who argue different positions.

Doing work in the environs of cities, I do know that there is massive pressure by people who want to build their own large house on a big field. It is bad for the environment - and degrades the spaces between towns, increases traffic, reduces the quality of potential services, makes it bad for pedestrians etc. etc.
For people who are against "local needs" clauses - what do you propose? A free for all?


How about no discrimination based on where you are from or grew up.

_________________
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=2281&p=374552&hilit=IMF+database#p374552
^^DOOM ^^


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: So, Just How Corrupt Was The Planning Process?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:00 pm 
Offline
Planning Tribunal Attendee

Joined: Jan 25, 2007
Posts: 1323
Blindjustice BATONEFFECT wrote:
How about no discrimination based on where you are from or grew up.

That's fine, and there are questions as to the nature of the legality of the existing - but there does need to some way of controlling building in the countryside. What I see is hundreds of houses in estates in commuter villages which are not being sold, and at the same time people building one off housing next to all that on the basis of a "housing need".

What I think is needed is an extremely in-depth proof requirement to prove that there is a housing need by a given individual in an area and that nothing in the area available for sale meets the requirements.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: So, Just How Corrupt Was The Planning Process?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:31 pm 
Offline
Of Systemic Importance
User avatar

Joined: Nov 6, 2006
Posts: 6808
Location: Australia
superman wrote:
Blindjustice BATONEFFECT wrote:
How about no discrimination based on where you are from or grew up.

That's fine, and there are questions as to the nature of the legality of the existing - but there does need to some way of controlling building in the countryside. What I see is hundreds of houses in estates in commuter villages which are not being sold, and at the same time people building one off housing next to all that on the basis of a "housing need".

What I think is needed is an extremely in-depth proof requirement to prove that there is a housing need by a given individual in an area and that nothing in the area available for sale meets the requirements.


What that suggests to me is that the one offs were more viable than the ghost estates.

How about looking at how things are sometimes done abroad. Developer buys a site & gets planning and subdivides the land. People buy the plots and tell the builder how they want their house built. (For this to work the planning would need to be different). No more lego houses and you get your own place to your spec. We have a real problem with the size of houses and apartments in Ireland. The only ones that seem to have decent sizes are one offs. That and the ability to spec your own house must be major reasons people go for them above legoland houses and apartments.

_________________
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=2281&p=374552&hilit=IMF+database#p374552
^^DOOM ^^


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: So, Just How Corrupt Was The Planning Process?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:58 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation
User avatar

Joined: Aug 27, 2011
Posts: 2001
Location: Local bubble zone
yoganmahew wrote:

Quote:
In relation to hedgerows around one off houses - they are in the vast majority are non native plants - Leylandia, Beech etc
I have never seen a species rich hedgerow planted around a house

You are confusing 'like' with 'habitat'. I don't like leylandii either, but they provide an excellent nesting habitat and winter protection for birds.

I suggest you haven't looked too hard for species rich hedgerows around houses. I also suggest you should look again at what passes for hedgerows maintained by farmers at the insistence of councils. Pathetic buzzcut mounds of dead and dying trees over-run with bramble. Oh, but wait, we can't have the cars of those urban dwellers scratched as they speed from town to town.

..


Too be fair i think i know that difference between 'like' and 'habitat'
Non native species support very little ecology - fact
My knowledge of Sugar beet is a bit rusty though :)

In reality many farmers (outside REPS) do not maintain hedgerows and they are off little ecology value either
A hedgerow needs to be relatively wide and trimmed regularly
The buzz cutting actually helps the structure of the hedge and therefore ecology - ideally the hedge should be over 2 m wide at the base.

Quote:
Different features of a hedgerow will be important to different species. The more diverse in composition a hedgerow is the more species it is likely to support due to a diversity of flowering and fruiting times. In general, native hedge plants such as blackthorn Prunus spinosa, hawthorn Crataegus monogyna, hazel Corylus avellena, dogwood Cornus sanguinea and field maple Acer campestris will support many more species than non-native plants such as garden privet, Ligustrum ovalifolium, leylandii and sycamore Acer psedoplatanus. Older hedgerows often contain a large amount of dead wood and plant litter within the structure of the hedge and can provide a valuable habitat for many invertebrates (which in turn will attract predators such as bats, shrews and birds) and cover for small mammals. Hedge bases are an important feature and provide a buffer zone to protect root systems and which can be an important habitat in its own right.

Management practices are crucial to the maintenance of a healthy hedge beneficial to wildlife: hedge laying, where the layed stems die off as the new shoots grow provides a source of dead wood. Coppicing, where stems are cut just above the ground, can provide a new lease of life to seriously damaged hedgerows. The timing of management is important to get the best from a hedge and avoid disturbance to animals breeding or over-wintering. The cutting cycle will determine the availability of fruits and flowers in a hedge; typically a cycle of two to three years is most beneficial for wildlife.

http://www.hedgelink.org.uk/index.php?id=26

If we continue building one off houses we will just have continuous urban sprawl. The outskirts of Galway City is an example.

I'm not having a pop at Rural dwellers as you have suggested i am saying. We have enough one off houses at this stage. A one off housing policy is non existent. No other country in Europe allows the amount of one of housing we do. It is unsustainable.

http://www.antaisce.org/builtenvironmen ... nment.aspx

Anyway this completely of the point of the thread.

_________________
Qi hu nan xia: When one rides a tiger, it is difficult to dismount.
House prices are cyclical, no nation has ever lived through a perpetual house price expansion or contraction.
Money is a public good; as such, it lends itself to private exploitation - CP Kindleberger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: So, Just How Corrupt Was The Planning Process?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:05 pm 
Offline
Planning Tribunal Attendee

Joined: Jan 25, 2007
Posts: 1323
Blindjustice BATONEFFECT wrote:
What that suggests to me is that the one offs were more viable than the ghost estates.

How about looking at how things are sometimes done abroad. Developer buys a site & gets planning and subdivides the land. People buy the plots and tell the builder how they want their house built. (For this to work the planning would need to be different). No more lego houses and you get your own place to your spec. We have a real problem with the size of houses and apartments in Ireland. The only ones that seem to have decent sizes are one offs. That and the ability to spec your own house must be major reasons people go for them above legoland houses and apartments.

I agree on the plots of land thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: So, Just How Corrupt Was The Planning Process?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:45 pm 
Offline
Property Magnate

Joined: Jan 31, 2009
Posts: 567
johnnyone234 wrote:
Too be fair i think i know that difference between 'like' and 'habitat'
Non native species support very little ecology - fact


Quote:
Different features of a hedgerow will be important to different species. The more diverse in composition a hedgerow is the more species it is likely to support due to a diversity of flowering and fruiting times. In general, native hedge plants such as blackthorn Prunus spinosa, hawthorn Crataegus monogyna, hazel Corylus avellena, dogwood Cornus sanguinea and field maple Acer campestris will support many more species than non-native plants such as garden privet, Ligustrum ovalifolium, leylandii and sycamore Acer psedoplatanus. Older hedgerows often contain a large amount of dead wood and plant litter within the structure of the hedge and can provide a valuable habitat for many invertebrates (which in turn will attract predators such as bats, shrews and birds) and cover for small mammals. Hedge bases are an important feature and provide a buffer zone to protect root systems and which can be an important habitat in its own right.

Management practices are crucial to the maintenance of a healthy hedge beneficial to wildlife: hedge laying, where the layed stems die off as the new shoots grow provides a source of dead wood. Coppicing, where stems are cut just above the ground, can provide a new lease of life to seriously damaged hedgerows. The timing of management is important to get the best from a hedge and avoid disturbance to animals breeding or over-wintering. The cutting cycle will determine the availability of fruits and flowers in a hedge; typically a cycle of two to three years is most beneficial for wildlife.

http://www.hedgelink.org.uk/index.php?id=26

Last time I looked, the field maple (Acer campestris) was non-native here. On the other hand, some species of privet is reckoned to probably be native in some areas (without consulting Webb, I cannot be sure whether it is the species you have mentioned).
Which goes to show, while agreeing with your general thesis, one of the difficulties involved in using reference works from the island next door!
In fact, IIRC, they have many many more native species than we have, both plants and animals.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: So, Just How Corrupt Was The Planning Process?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:08 pm 
Online
Nationalised

Joined: Sep 13, 2007
Posts: 27178
Location: Tullamore
Mantach wrote:
Last time I looked, the field maple (Acer campestris) was non-native here. On the other hand, some species of privet is reckoned to probably be native in some areas (without consulting Webb, I cannot be sure whether it is the species you have mentioned).
Which goes to show, while agreeing with your general thesis, one of the difficulties involved in using reference works from the island next door!
In fact, IIRC, they have many many more native species than we have, both plants and animals.

Not sure that Dogwood is either, but like hazel and holly, it may be considered a shrub.

_________________
"It is impossible to design a system so perfect that no one needs to be good."

So long and thanks for all the fish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: So, Just How Corrupt Was The Planning Process?
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:14 pm 
Offline
Under CAB Investigation
User avatar

Joined: Aug 27, 2011
Posts: 2001
Location: Local bubble zone
Mantach wrote:
johnnyone234 wrote:
Too be fair i think i know that difference between 'like' and 'habitat'
Non native species support very little ecology - fact


Quote:
Different features of a hedgerow will be important to different species. The more diverse in composition a hedgerow is the more species it is likely to support due to a diversity of flowering and fruiting times. In general, native hedge plants such as blackthorn Prunus spinosa, hawthorn Crataegus monogyna, hazel Corylus avellena, dogwood Cornus sanguinea and field maple Acer campestris will support many more species than non-native plants such as garden privet, Ligustrum ovalifolium, leylandii and sycamore Acer psedoplatanus. Older hedgerows often contain a large amount of dead wood and plant litter within the structure of the hedge and can provide a valuable habitat for many invertebrates (which in turn will attract predators such as bats, shrews and birds) and cover for small mammals. Hedge bases are an important feature and provide a buffer zone to protect root systems and which can be an important habitat in its own right.

Management practices are crucial to the maintenance of a healthy hedge beneficial to wildlife: hedge laying, where the layed stems die off as the new shoots grow provides a source of dead wood. Coppicing, where stems are cut just above the ground, can provide a new lease of life to seriously damaged hedgerows. The timing of management is important to get the best from a hedge and avoid disturbance to animals breeding or over-wintering. The cutting cycle will determine the availability of fruits and flowers in a hedge; typically a cycle of two to three years is most beneficial for wildlife.

http://www.hedgelink.org.uk/index.php?id=26

Last time I looked, the field maple (Acer campestris) was non-native here. On the other hand, some species of privet is reckoned to probably be native in some areas (without consulting Webb, I cannot be sure whether it is the species you have mentioned).
Which goes to show, while agreeing with your general thesis, one of the difficulties involved in using reference works from the island next door!
In fact, IIRC, they have many many more native species than we have, both plants and animals.

correct, couldnt find a decent ref for here, field maple is native to the SE of england
One type of Privet is native, dogwood is native but rare, holly and hazel are good hedgerow species.

_________________
Qi hu nan xia: When one rides a tiger, it is difficult to dismount.
House prices are cyclical, no nation has ever lived through a perpetual house price expansion or contraction.
Money is a public good; as such, it lends itself to private exploitation - CP Kindleberger


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Col. Max Pyatnitski, ex-Patrick, Google [Bot], propietario and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to: